Jorge Luis Borges employs irony—a contrast between expectation and reality, or what seems to be and what is—as a tool to accentuate the inherent contradictions and perplexities enmeshed within the Library’s fabric. Although the Library appears boundless, offering the promise of limitless knowledge, it ultimately delivers no discernible or quantifiable truths: “For every rational line or forthright statement there are leagues of senseless cacophony, verbal nonsense, and incoherency” (Paragraph 5). Profound wisdom remains obscured amid the ceaseless proliferation of nonsensical text, underscoring the irony that the quest for enlightenment often leads to encounters with meaningless and haphazard data. In a paradoxical twist, the existence of every conceivable book, encompassing both thoughtful and trivial content, paradoxically diminishes the significance of each, as most are comprised of arbitrary combinations of letters, punctuation marks, and paragraphs.

The story’s irony is particularly striking when we examine how the Library is depicted as a divine and flawless entity, a portrayal that directly challenges the conventional concept of a benevolent and all-knowing deity. This subtle critique of the notion of an all-encompassing God becomes evident as the librarian implies that the Library deliberately withholds information from its worshippers.