Consider the way that Crudd treats children, as opposed to the way the Sweep treats children, including Nan and Toby. How do these two opposing father figures operate as character foils?

Do you agree with the Sweep’s decision to leave Nan before his death, in order to save her the pain of watching him die? Or did his unannounced departure create unnecessary pain and confusion? Use examples from the text to support your opinion.

Consider Roger’s childhood (sold to Crudd by his desperate family) as well as his behavior toward Nan and the other sweeps. Does Roger more closely conform to the character trope of the villainous antagonist, or the pitiable victim? Justify your answer using textual evidence.