Assess the plausibility of the scenario Jacobsen’s book presents. What specific factors contribute to making it seem like a credible event? Consider historical precedents, current international relations, and technological capabilities. What elements in the narrative make the hypothetical more or less believable as an event?

Why might Jacobsen begin her timeline of the nuclear era with the 1960 meeting for the General Nuclear War rather than the bombing of Hiroshima or the development of the hydrogen bomb? Discuss the historical and thematic significance of this choice. What implications does this narrative decision have on the text?

The novel’s hypothetical scenario begins with the launch of a nuclear missile, with no mention of the preceding political context. How does this narrative choice impact the unfolding of events throughout the book? What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of starting the story at this critical moment rather than providing background information?