60 pages 2 hours read

Ali Hazelwood

Love on the Brain

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Discrimination Experienced by Women in STEM

Hazelwood is especially known for writing romance novels about women in STEM and academia, and she draws on her own experiences of being a woman in STEM, as a PhD student (and eventual professor) of neuroscience, in detailing the discrimination women face in these fields. The research institutions in her novels are more than just settings: They provide the context in which her protagonists experience both subtle and overt gender discrimination.

Despite being the project’s leading scientist, Bee consistently experiences discriminatory attitudes and behaviors from those around her, from subordinates, peers, higher-ups, and even on a systemic basis. Bee is an expert in neuroscience, but her interactions with the engineers see them constantly rejecting her valid and accurate input until Levi intervenes. Her authority stemming from both expertise and designation are initially all but ignored, owing to her being a woman.

This is further highlighted when, during one of their first conversations, Levi asks Bee to adhere to the workplace dress code, referring to her colored hair, piercings, and make-up. Levi later reveals he did so in order to protect her job, despite not ascribing to the dress code recommendations himself. The politics between NASA and NIH lead NASA to look for any reason to oust NIH from the joint project, and Bee’s unique look could be used as an excuse to question her professionalism. The situation represents the unfair and discriminatory standards to which women are held in the workplace, including in STEM: rather than pay attention to Bee’s work, her boss focuses on a perceived flaw in her appearance, a kind of scrutiny her male colleagues never have to experience.

Bee’s boss at NIH, Trevor Slate, is yet another example of the clear double-standards for women in STEM. When he learns that the project has not yet begun after a full week, he holds Bee accountable, threatening to replace her, despite circumstances being completely out of her control. When the BLINK demo rolls around, Trevor attributes its success to Levi, assuming that the male co-lead came up with the solution.

The conversation around the GRE reveals other systemic issues that can hinder a woman’s success in STEM and academia more broadly. Kaylee describes how the test inherently disadvantages women and other marginalized groups, and the fact that it is a gatekeeping mechanism prevents those affected by the discrimination from entering STEM and academia. This leads to an overrepresentation of white men in the field as is evidenced by the almost entirely white and male team at BLINK. While Bee has already surpassed these hurdles, her personal life remains subject to scrutiny: Bee is uncomfortable publicizing her relationship with Levi, and he understands it is because she will receive an unfair amount of flak for it, unlike him.

The anecdotes from Marie Curie’s life illustrate how little has changed for women in STEM over more than a century. Curie was rejected from a faculty position at University of Krakow for being a woman; she was initially denied a Nobel nomination for her own work until a male scientist interceded; and she was vilified by the press for her relationship with a younger man though it had no bearing on her career. By paralleling these real-life historical incidents with the experiences of the characters in the book, Hazelwood highlights the still-prevalent discriminatory attitudes and practices that impact women in STEM and academia, indicating how much progress there still remains to be made.

The Impact of Family and Childhood Experiences on Adult Relationships

Family and childhood experiences are an important aspect of the book, particularly in how they impact different characters’ approaches to relationships. The first chapter details the death of her parents when Bee was young, and this tragedy is the root of Bee’s deep fear of abandonment, which manifests in her “avoidant attachment” relationship style. Over the course of the story, the reader learns that Bee’s cheating ex-fiancé has made her even more wary about relationships, which puts the potential for her future with Levi in jeopardy. Bee persists in her belief that her relationship with Levi is casual despite all evidence to the contrary, including his explicit declarations of interest in her. She does not factor him in at all when the possibility of losing her job arises and prepares to leave Houston without giving a thought to their future.

Levi has his own share of early childhood and family experiences that influence the way he approaches relationships. He describes his home environment growing up as hostile and uncommunicative, which led him to behave similarly as an adult, especially during grad school. Levi’s needs and desires are neglected by his avid hunting and military-oriented family. They want him to suppress his personality and conform to their idea of who he should be. As a vegan and a civilian, Levi is a disappointment to them despite his accomplishments and his genuine character.

Unlike Bee, Levi shows maturity and insight by recognizing that these experiences have negatively impacted his relationships, and he avails himself of therapy to work out some of these issues. His sensitive and respectful behavior towards everyone around him, including Bee when she meets him again at NASA, and his ability to articulate these experiences and their impact on him (as Schmac does to “Marie”), is proof that it is possible to transcend the negative impact of early childhood and family relationships. Fittingly, Bee, too, eventually confronts her fear of abandonment, and when she decides to commit to the relationship, the couple receives their happy ending.

The Gap between Perceptions and Reality

A recurring theme throughout the book is how perceptions and reality can greatly differ. Perhaps the biggest example of this is Bee and Levi’s enemies-to-lovers relationship. Bee’s initial conception of Levi is shown to be a perception not rooted in reality as she believes him to be insensitive, sexist, and antagonistic to the point of actively sabotaging her role in BLINK. However, all of these perceptions are proven to be untrue. In fact, the very opposite is the case. Hazelwood creates these misunderstandings by allowing Bee to form conclusions based on incomplete data. For example, Levi avoids Bee in grad school because his attraction to her distracts him. Without knowing the reason for his avoidance, Bee assumes it is because he dislikes her. As a scientist, Bee would never jump to conclusions without knowing all the facts and variables, but as Hazelwood often emphasizes, the brain works differently in love versus science.

This gap between perception and reality that exists in Bee and Levi’s relationship is paralleled by two other equations: Rocío and Kaylee, and “Marie” and Schmac. Rocío and Kaylee echo the issues present in Bee and Levi’s relationship. Their dynamic, too, starts off with apparent dislike that is later discovered to be intense attraction. They, too, eventually end up romantically involved and receive a happy ending. On the other hand, “Marie” and Schmac see their connection from the beginning: On Twitter, without external situations to misconstrue, the connection between Bee and Levi is clear. Their connection is ironic because social media platforms are typically seen as disconnected and impersonal.

Characters who are hiding bad intentions show another side of this theme. Guy comes across as friendly, unassuming, and harmless but is revealed to be the villain of the story, one who poses real danger to Bee’s life. Tim and Annie likewise hide their true selves: A chronic liar, Tim turns out to be very different than Bee expects while Annie betrays Bee in a way Bee could never imagine. Through these betrayals and misconceptions, Hazelwood emphasizes that though people may be extremely intelligent, like Bee, they can be subject to emotions that cloud their judgment. Playing on the contrast between scientific certainty and emotional subjectivity, Hazelwood requires her characters to look beneath the surface of others’ actions and interrogate their own intentions and emotional blind spots. For instance, Bee knew about Tim’s infidelity, but she convinced herself that things would change. In that case, Bee twisted reality to conform to her desire for a strong relationship. She let fear stop her from confronting the truth, but when she finally did, she was able to find a more positive situation.

Related Titles

By Ali Hazelwood

Study Guide

logo

Check & Mate

Ali Hazelwood

Check & Mate

Ali Hazelwood

Study Guide

logo

Love, Theoretically

Ali Hazelwood

Love, Theoretically

Ali Hazelwood

Study Guide

logo

Not in Love

Ali Hazelwood

Not in Love

Ali Hazelwood

Study Guide

logo

The Love Hypothesis

Ali Hazelwood

The Love Hypothesis

Ali Hazelwood