Good arguments use three techniques to prove their point: logos (logical appeal), ethos (ethical appeal), and pathos (emotional appeal). How well does Ross use these three elements to prove his thesis? Use examples of logos, ethos, and pathos from the book to support your answer.

Why does Rose include so much of his life story and personal experience in Lives on the Boundary? How does including this kind of detail help him prove the book’s central argument about the American education system and its effect on marginalized students?

Rose argues that socioeconomic factors like race, class, and income play a huge factor in whether students are able to succeed in the American education system. Do you agree or disagree? Use examples from the book as well as your own experience to support your answer.