Louv argues for a radical transformation of the education system to incorporate nature and experiential learning at all levels, from primary school to higher education. Research shows that environment-based education leads to improved standardized test scores, grade-point averages, and even behavioral outcomes.

Louv compares America’s focus on early standardized testing to Finland’s educational model, which delays formal schooling and prioritizes play and environmental learning. The latter approach is proven to be more effective, with case studies from US schools indicating a 27% increase in mastery of science concepts among at-risk sixth graders through outdoor programs. Higher education also requires an overhaul, as argued by David Orr, who proposes a college-level environmental literacy requirement. He seeks to transform students into “better planetary citizens” (224) through education. Louv also advocates for a return to natural history, arguing that it is crucial for developing a holistic and intuitive understanding of science and a renewed focus on “intuition, imagination, creativity, and iconoclasm” (225). The text highlights a plethora of approaches, from gardening to local science projects, as transformative educational tools. Notably, such environment-based education can rekindle the connection between young people and the natural world, turning schools into a “portal” rather than a “polite form of incarceration” (226).