Bottle of Lies has drawn comparisons to Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle. Although separated by time and genre, these two books share a common thread in their exposés of unethical practices within industries critical to public health. While The Jungle unveiled the horrors of the meatpacking industry in early 20th-century America, Bottle of Lies delves into the world of generic drug manufacturing in the 21st century.

Published in 1906, The Jungle shocked readers with its vivid depiction of the unsanitary conditions, labor exploitation, and corruption in the Chicago meatpacking industry. Sinclair’s narrative—initially aimed at highlighting the plight of immigrant workers—inadvertently exposed the compromised quality of the food the industry produced. The book catalyzed significant changes in food safety regulation, eventually leading to the establishment of the US FDA.

Written in the 21st century, Bottle of Lies tackles a comparable theme—the integrity of the pharmaceutical industry. Eban’s investigation into the practices of Ranbaxy, a major player in generic drug manufacturing, uncovers a complex web of fraud, data manipulation, and compromised quality control. The book, like The Jungle, reveals the alarming consequences of prioritizing profit over public health.

Both books explore the theme of regulatory failure.